The grade we install
Conductive: 2.5 x 10^4 to 1.0 x 10^6 ohms
This is the tighter of the two static control bands and the one New Era installs. It moves a charge off the floor fastest, which is what gets specified when the discharge itself is the hazard rather than the part being handled[5].
Conductive against dissipative
Same job, different speed. The ESD Association publishes both bands and is clear that neither one is universally correct[5].
| Conductive | Static dissipative | |
|---|---|---|
| Resistance band | 2.5 x 10^4 to 1.0 x 10^6 ohms | 1.0 x 10^6 to 1.0 x 10^9 ohms |
| Charge moves | Fastest | Slower, more gradual |
| Usual home | Explosives, energetics, munitions, hazardous processing | Electronics assembly, board handling, most ESD sensitive work |
| Specified by | DESR 6055.09 for arms and ammunition areas | ANSI/ESD S20.20 control programs |
| New Era installs | Yes, this is the grade we put down | Available if your spec calls for it |
Where conductive is the requirement
The clearest case is US Department of Defense explosives work. DESR 6055.09 makes conductive flooring mandatory in ammunition load, assemble and pack areas, propellant casting, pyrotechnic assembly and energetics manufacturing[10]. In those rooms a discharge is an ignition source, so the floor has to move the charge before it can build.
Hospitals used to be on this list
NFPA 99 required conductive flooring at 2.5 x 10^4 to 1.0 x 10^6 ohms in operating rooms using flammable anesthetics. That requirement was removed in the 2015 edition and is still absent from the 2024 edition, because those anesthetics are essentially gone from US surgical practice[9].
FAA facilities go higher, not lower
FAA-STD-019 sets floor resistance between 1.0 x 10^6 to 1.0 x 10^9 ohms in rooms with energized equipment[11]. That is deliberately above a typical manufacturing floor, for personnel safety around live power.
The system as published
Manufacturer technical data for the conductive system, verified against the data sheet[7].
| Property | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Applied thickness | 5 to 7 (6 typical) mils | manufacturer TDS, Kretus SELECT ESD Epoxy Conductive/Dis |
| Solids | 100 percent solids | manufacturer TDS |
| Application temperature | 50 to 90 degrees F | manufacturer TDS |
| Ambient humidity limit | under 90 percent RH | manufacturer TDS |
| Substrate above dew point | 5 degrees F above dew point | manufacturer TDS |
| Foot traffic | 24 hours | manufacturer TDS |
| Vehicle traffic | 7 days | manufacturer TDS |
Questions
Is conductive flooring safe to stand on?
Yes. The resistance band is chosen so the floor drains a charge without the person becoming the fastest path to ground. That is the whole reason the requirement is a band with a lower bound and not simply 'as conductive as possible'. In rooms with energized equipment the required band is deliberately raised, which is what FAA-STD-019 does[11].
Do we need conductive or is dissipative enough?
Your program document decides. Dissipative is the default for most electronics work[5]. Conductive is specified where a spark could ignite something, which in practice means explosives and energetics areas under DESR 6055.09[10]. If you are unsure which applies, start with the standards page.
How is the finished floor checked against the band?
Can conductive go over an existing floor?
Sometimes, and it depends entirely on what is down now and what state the slab is in. A previous coating, a sealer or wax will all sit between the new system and the ground path. How prep is decided, or send us the room.
Sources
- https://www.esda.org/store/standards/product/33/ansiesd-stm7-1-2020/
- https://webstore.ansi.org/standards/esda/ansiesdstm972025
- https://www.esda.org/store/standards/product/36/ansiesd-stm97-2-2016/
- https://www.esda.org/news/static-control-flooring-conductive-or-dissipative/
- https://www.arcat.com/datasheets/kretus/TDS_ESDN-Epoxy_052824.pdf
- https://incompliancemag.com/why-resistance-requirements-differ-by-industry-and-why-standards-matter/
- https://www.denix.osd.mil/ddes/denix-files/sites/32/2022/08/DESR-6055.09-Edition1-Change-2-251208.pdf
- https://staticworx.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/FAA-STD-019f-20171018.pdf
- https://www.esda.org/store/standards/product/339/esd-tr53-01-22/